摘要
文章主要分析新能源汽车高压充电座中不同线径导线共压端子的类型与潜在风险。首先重点探讨信号线与PE线大倍率线径共压时因拉力值悬殊导致的信号线断裂问题,其次对比阐述MW型压接与六面压接之间的优劣,最后提出通过优化压接工艺、模具设计及线束固定等改善措施,以提升共压端子的连接可靠性,为产品开发与品质控制提供依据。
Abstract
This article mainly analyzes the types and potential risks of common voltage terminals for wires of different diameters in the high-voltage charging base of new energy vehicles. Firstly, this paper focuses on discussing the problem of signal line breakage caused by the significant difference in tensile force values when the signal line and the PE line are co-pressed at high magnification wire diameters. Secondly, it compares and elaborates on the advantages and disadvantages of MW-type crimping and six-sided crimping. Finally, it proposes improvement measures such as optimizing the crimping process, mold design, and wire harness fixation to enhance the connection reliability of the co-pressed terminal, providing a basis for product development and quality control.
关键词
高压充电座 /
共压端子 /
PE线
Key words
high-voltage charging seat /
common-crimp terminal /
PE line
陈杰, 王胜利, 侯晨星, 李禹灿, 蒋朋光, 张富豪.
浅谈高压充电座共压端子线径差[J]. 汽车电器. 2025, 1(11): 12-14
Chen Jie, Wang Shengli, Hou Chenxing, Li Yucan, Jiang Pengguang, Zhang Fuhao.
Discussion on the Wire Diameter Difference of Common Voltage Terminal of High-voltage Charging Pedestal[J]. AUTO ELECTRIC PARTS. 2025, 1(11): 12-14
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 姬红亮,钟华强,李园园,等,浅谈线束导线管式端子和屏蔽环压接方式[J].汽车电器,2020(4):77-78.
[2] 张玉平,张震华,闫亮亮.谈汽车线束制造中的防错设计[C]//第十五届河南省汽车工程科技学术研讨会论文集,2018:147-149.
[3] QC/T 29106—2014,汽车电线束技术条件[S].
[4] GB/T 20234.3—2023,电动汽车传导充电用连接装置第3部分:直流充电接口[S].
[5] GB/T 20234.2—2023,电动汽车传导充电用连接装置第2部分:交流充电接口[S].